The Strong Heart Study

The longest-running study of cardiovascular health in American Indian communities.

Three field centers. Three Tribal Nations. Nearly four decades of science that serves the people it studies.

In 1985, the Secretary's Task Force on Black and Minority Health — known as the Heckler Report — identified a critical gap: there was almost no cardiovascular data on American Indian populations. The health system was making decisions about Native communities using evidence built on other populations.

The Strong Heart Study was the direct response. Launched in 1988, it set out to understand why heart disease, diabetes, and their risk factors affect American Indian communities differently — and to build the evidence base that was missing from national health planning.

Nearly forty years later, SHS has produced one of the most comprehensive longitudinal datasets on cardiovascular health in any population — and every bit of it was collected in partnership with the Tribal Nations it serves.

0
Publications
0
Citations
3
Field Centers
3
Tribal Nations
1985
The Heckler Report
Federal task force identifies critical gap in American Indian cardiovascular data. No large-scale study exists.
1988
Strong Heart Study Launches
NHLBI funds the first phase. Missouri Breaks becomes the Northern Plains field center, based in Eagle Butte, South Dakota.
2009
CRST Data Sovereignty Resolution
When NIH required open data sharing, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe passed a unanimous resolution declaring that DNA data belongs to the Tribe. NIH honored it for all SHS communities.
2022–
Acceleration
135 publications in the last five years alone — more than a quarter of the study's lifetime output. The questions aren't slowing down, and neither is the research.

2 — The Impact

What came out of this — and why it matters.

Research doesn't treat patients. It changes the systems that do. Before the Strong Heart Study, American Indian communities were invisible in the cardiovascular science that was supposed to protect them. Here's what changed.

2,100+
Citations
Risk Assessment — Fixed
The Framingham risk calculator — the tool doctors across America use to predict heart disease — was validated for American Indian patients using Strong Heart data. Before that, clinicians were using tools built on other populations and guessing.
SDPI
Evidence
Diabetes Burden — Quantified
Strong Heart documented the diabetes-cardiovascular link in American Indian communities for the first time — evidence that helped make the case for federal programs like the Special Diabetes Program for Indians. SDPI now uses SHS data as a benchmark to measure whether its interventions are working.
497
Papers
Evidence That Moves Legislators
When tribal leaders go to Washington to advocate for funding and resources, they need numbers. Not stories about suffering — evidence that shows what works, what's needed, and what the return on investment looks like. SHS provides that evidence.
135
Since 2022
Accelerating — Not Slowing Down
The last five years produced more than a quarter of everything the study has ever published. New areas include environmental health, genomics, kidney disease, and sphingolipid metabolism. The questions our communities need answered are only growing.

Local research helps us make standards specific to our population to diagnose, treat, and prevent health conditions. It allows us to modify and improve interventions that are designed by and for our people. And the data can be used by the Tribe and community programs to help secure grant funding.

This is what happens when research stays in the community long enough to matter.

3 — Data Sovereignty

The data belongs to the people who generated it.

We know the history. Tribes have experienced adverse consequences from investigators being insensitive to sacred traditions. Research data collected from Indigenous communities has been used without consent, shared without permission, and stored in repositories where the people it came from had no say in how it was used.

The Strong Heart Study operates on a different principle: the Tribal Nations that participate in this research are the rightful stewards of their data and knowledge. This isn't a policy we adopted. It's how this study has operated from the beginning.

Collective Benefit
Data should be used in ways that benefit the communities it comes from — not just individual researchers, institutions, or grant applications. Every SHS publication goes through tribal review to ensure the work serves the people.
Authority to Control
Tribal Nations have the authority to govern how their data is collected, used, and shared. No outside researcher accesses SHS data without going through the tribal IRB. No publication leaves without tribal approval.
Responsibility
Those who work with Indigenous data have a responsibility to use it ethically and in the interest of the community. The trust between SHS and the Tribes has been established carefully over time and cannot be automatically transferred to investigators who have no such relationship.
Ethics
Data collection and use must align with the rights and values of Indigenous peoples. This includes respect for Lakota cultural considerations about body, spirit, and the 7 Generations Principle — the understanding that our decisions today must serve future generations.

What this looked like in practice

In 2009, the NIH told us that open data sharing was now required for all federally funded projects. The SHS investigators had been meeting with NIH about this policy — and refused to budge. The data, they believed, belonged to the Tribal partners. Not to NIH. Not to a public repository.

NIH finally said: if you can get a letter from one Tribal nation stating they oppose open data sharing, we'll honor it for all SHS data.

The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe passed Resolution No. 1-2009-CR — unanimously. Fifteen yes, zero no. It declared that all DNA information collected on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation belongs to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and may not be released without specific Tribal authorization.

The resolution also stated what the Tribe already knew: that the trust between the SHS and the Tribes had been built carefully over time, and could not automatically be transferred to investigators who had no such relationship with the community.

NIH honored that resolution for all SHS Tribes. That's what decades of trust look like when it counts.

4 — Knowledge to Community

Returning the science to the people it belongs to.

497 publications in peer-reviewed journals is important. But a paper in the European Journal of Epidemiology doesn't help a community health worker in Eagle Butte explain to a patient why their risk factors matter. Research locked behind jargon and paywalls doesn't serve the community that made it possible.

That's why we're building tools to make Strong Heart Study research accessible and usable — for community members, tribal leaders, clinicians, and the next generation.

Science Simplified
Plain-language summaries and infographics that translate published SHS research into something anyone can read, share, and use. Each summary is reviewed by the original author to ensure accuracy, intent, and alignment with SHS governance.
Publication Registry
A searchable, organized database of every Strong Heart Study publication — making it possible for tribal leaders, program directors, and researchers to find exactly what they need without digging through academic databases.
Community Health Updates
When SHS research produces findings that directly affect community health — like the dangers of burning garbage in rural areas — we translate it into actionable information: what was found, what it means for you, and what you can do.
Supporting the Next Generation
SHS data and summaries support youth projects, educate community members, and keep tribal legislators and clinicians updated on regional health matters. The goal is a community that knows what its own data says — and can use it.

It took 40 years from the first evidence on smoking before rates meaningfully dropped. Change is slow. But without the evidence, there is nothing to change. And without returning that evidence to the community, the change never reaches the people who need it most.

The knowledge belongs to the community. We're making sure it gets there.